GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the cheaper of the two across every workload shape tested below. Headline rates are $5 in / $30 out for GPT-5.6 Sol versus $2 in / $6 out for Grok 4.6, per million tokens.
Real monthly cost, three workloads
| Workload | GPT-5.6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support chatbot 1.5k in / 400 out · 100k req/mo · 30% cached | $1,748 | $472.50 | Grok 4.6 (3.7× cheaper) |
| RAG / doc Q&A 12k in / 700 out · 50k req/mo · 60% cached | $2,430 | $870.00 | Grok 4.6 (2.8× cheaper) |
| Coding agent 25k in / 2.5k out · 20k req/mo · 80% cached | $2,200 | $700.00 | Grok 4.6 (3.1× cheaper) |
Costs include prompt caching at the stated hit rate and per-model tokenizer correction. Adjust for your own traffic →
Specifications side by side
| GPT-5.6 Sol | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Input / M tokens | $5 | $2 |
| Output / M tokens | $30 | $6 |
| Cached input | $0.5 | $0.5 |
| Context window | 1050K | 500K |
| Batch discount | −50% | — |
| Tokenizer factor | ×1 | ×1 |
| Min prefix to cache | — | — |
| Announced retirement | — | — |
Which should you pick?
On cost alone, Grok 4.6 wins every workload shape above.
Full detail: GPT-5.6 Sol · Grok 4.6
All figures verified 2026-08-18 against official provider documentation. Fields a provider does not publish are shown as “—” rather than estimated.